Solutions
Keep approval tied to the work being delivered.
Use a named completion checkpoint and require a fresh review when material scope changes.
The work to improve
A decision loses meaning if the task changes after approval but retains the same green status.
Reviewers can inspect the linked task and supporting records before deciding. Source permissions still apply, so receiving a review does not open unrelated or private work.
The server checks the current review and task scope at completion. That makes the checkpoint part of the workflow rather than a badge whose meaning depends on everyone remembering what changed.
What changes for your team
- Make reviewer responsibility visible.
- Keep prior decisions while reviewing changed work.
- Prevent completion without the required current-scope approval.
What you can explore in Vision
- One to five active independent reviewers for ordinary tasks
- Any-reviewer or all-reviewer completion rules
- Supporting source details and retained decision history
Questions worth asking
Is every task gated?
No. Ordinary tasks remain ungated unless a completion review is requested.
What happens if the task changes after approval?
Material changes require a fresh completion review while prior decision history remains available.
Does the review due date approve automatically?
No. The due date is a deadline, not an approval decision.
Scope and availability
- This is one ordinary-task completion checkpoint, not a general multi-stage approval designer.
- Service fulfillment and Work Packs use their own specialized approval controls.